- Resource Links -

Debate Central

UIL Debate Site

Planet Debate

Coaching Speech .com

Baylor Briefs

Wiki of Cases

Big Sky Debate Page


Speech Association

University of North Texas
Library Search

How to Construct a
Policy Debate Case


Boston Debate League

Shelby Debate Society

Texas Debate Collective

Forsan High School Debate

- Files -

Computer Guidelines

Computers in Debate

CX Rules

CX Judge Criteria

Debate Constitution

Debate Resources

Inherency Tips

Internet Debate Research

UIL Speech/Debate Overview

LD Debate Handbook

PowerPoint Presentations

Stock Issues

Being Affirmative


debate 2014
Spring 2015 LD Debate Topic
RESOLVED: When in conflict, human rights protection ought to supersede state sovereignty in the conduct of United States foreign policy.

CX Debate Topic for 2015 - 2016

 The United States federal government should substantially curtail its domestic surveillance.

Introduction to the 2015-16 Policy Debate Topic


UIL Extemporaneous Speaking Overview from UIL on Vimeo.

Informative Speaking: 
The purpose of this contest is to stimulate an active interest in current affairs at the state, national and international levels, and to teach the student to present extemporaneously in a clear and impartial manner the facts about a subject as they appear in the best available sources of information. This contest is an exercise in clear thinking and informing the public on the issues and concerns of the American people. The objective is to present information orally in an interesting way, and an attempt should not be made to change the listener’s mind beyond presenting the information. The speaker has 30- minutes to prepare a speech on a topic they draw and are allowed to use one note card.

Persuasive Speaking:
The purpose of this contest is to train students to analyze a current issue, determine a point of view, and then organize and deliver extemporaneously a speech that seeks to persuade listeners to agree with that viewpoint. The objective is to reinforce the views of listeners who already believe as the speaker does, but even more so, to bring those of neutral or opposing views around to the speaker’s beliefs or proposed course of action. This oral contest should especially appeal to those who have a strong argumentative urge and who wish to advocate reforms or outline solutions for current problems.



This website is the sole property of    J.S.McVicars   ©